<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari for Windows: Is switching worth it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.micahville.com/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows-is-switching-worth-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.micahville.com/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows-is-switching-worth-it/</link>
	<description>Living the Digital Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:45:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anandi Hristina</title>
		<link>http://www.micahville.com/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows-is-switching-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5215</link>
		<dc:creator>Anandi Hristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 23:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahville.com/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows-is-switching-worth-it/#comment-5215</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s why it will never wor. Anandi Hristina.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s why it will never wor. Anandi Hristina.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hollin</title>
		<link>http://www.micahville.com/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows-is-switching-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hollin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahville.com/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows-is-switching-worth-it/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have to agree with Omer in this one. Safari has it&#039;s perks over the Mac version of Firefox, and the history and bookmark methods streamline very nicely. By promoting Safari for Windows, perhaps the only downside to Safari, various websites can&#039;t support the browser, will diminish due to a wider range of users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to agree with Omer in this one. Safari has it&#8217;s perks over the Mac version of Firefox, and the history and bookmark methods streamline very nicely. By promoting Safari for Windows, perhaps the only downside to Safari, various websites can&#8217;t support the browser, will diminish due to a wider range of users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omer Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.micahville.com/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows-is-switching-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Omer Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 04:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micahville.com/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows-is-switching-worth-it/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Hey,
  On Mac Safari does have plug-in support, not sure about Windows at the moment. Another great feature is &quot;find&quot;. Try &quot;Control-F&quot; or &quot;Command-F&quot; on a Mac, it is simply awesome. And I am not sure if I would use Safari on a PC, just because most of its coolness is within in its OS X integration. Nice post though, Micah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,<br />
  On Mac Safari does have plug-in support, not sure about Windows at the moment. Another great feature is &#8220;find&#8221;. Try &#8220;Control-F&#8221; or &#8220;Command-F&#8221; on a Mac, it is simply awesome. And I am not sure if I would use Safari on a PC, just because most of its coolness is within in its OS X integration. Nice post though, Micah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
